Q (sonnet): In the TCGA Breast Cancer study if a patient has both a PIK3CA mutation and a PTEN deletion what is their probability of having a luminal A subtype? Is this probability different from a patient with only a PIK3CA mutation? ▶ list_guides {} ◀ result {"result":[{"uri":"cbioportal://mutation-frequency-guide","description":"Comprehensive guide for calculating gene mutation frequencies with gene-specific profiling denominators"},{"uri":"cbioportal://clinical-data-guide","description":"Guide for querying clinical data including patient vs sample level considerations"},{"uri":"cbioportal://sample-filtering-guide","description":"Guide for filtering samples and studies in cBioPortal queries"},{"uri":"cbioportal://common-pitfalls","description":"Guide to avoid common mistakes when querying cBioPortal data. If you already know which numbered pitfall applies, fetch just that section via read_guide(\"cbioportal://common-pitfalls#\") (e.g. #16) instead of the full guide"},{"uri":"cbioportal://treatment-guide","description":"Guide for querying treatment/clinical event data including drug agents, timelines, and linking to genomic data"},{"uri":"cbioportal://faq-guide","description":"General cBioPortal FAQ: history, how to cite, data types, reference genome, abbreviations, GISTIC thresholds, API access"},{"uri":"cbioportal://statistical-tests-guide","description":"Statistical test selection guide — decision matrix for choosing Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon, chi-squared, t-test, ANOVA, etc. based on data type and group count"},{"uri":"cbioportal://gene-expression-guide","description":"Gene expression / copy-number / methylation analysis. Covers genetic_alteration_derived, profile_type discovery, and the gene_pair_coexpression view for Spearman correlation between two genes"},{"uri":"cbioportal://external-resources-guide","description":"Guide for finding external linked resources such as imaging, pathology, Minerva, HTAN, or other resource_* table links before declaring data unavailable"},{"uri":"cbioportal://gene-resolution-guide","description":"Guide for resolving ambiguous gene symbols, aliases, gene families, and shorthand such as CD3 before querying expression or alteration data"},{"uri":"cbioportal://study-resolution-guide","description":"Guide for resolving requested studies, avoiding silent substitute cohorts, and redirecting to known external cBioPortal instances when data is not in this deployment"},{"uri":"cbioportal://germline-guide","description":"Guide for querying germline variant data — storage columns, study discovery, query patterns, and somatic vs germline considerations"},{"uri":"cbioportal://study-guide/{study_id}","description":"Dynamic study-specific guide - use get_study_guide(study_id) tool to generate"}]} ▶ read_guide { "uri": "cbioportal://statistical-tests-guide" } ◀ result Statistical Test Selection Guide ================================ Purpose ------- This guide ensures the correct statistical test is selected before performing any group comparison, matching cBioPortal's own Group Comparison defaults. HARD RULES — NEVER FABRICATE A STATISTIC ---------------------------------------- ClickHouse cannot run statistical tests. The agent therefore must NEVER produce a derived statistic that is not a literal column value from a SQL result. Specifically: 1. **Never invent a p-value.** Not "p < 0.001", not "p ≈ 0.05", not any p-value. If the user asks "what is the p-value?", the answer is *"I can't compute that — here is the 2x2 contingency table (or group statistics). Run it in cBioPortal's Group Comparison tab, in R with `fisher.test(...)` / `wilcox.test(...)`, or in Python with `scipy.stats.fisher_exact(...)` / `mannwhitneyu(...)`."* 2. **Never claim mutual exclusivity (or co-occurrence) from a contingency table alone.** A 2x2 table is not a test. The shape "altered/not altered × group A/group B" needs Fisher's exact + a defined direction (odds ratio < 1 with significant p). Without that test, the agent presents the table and stops. Descriptive phrasing is also a claim: "largely/mostly mutually exclusive", "rarely co-occur", "tend to co-occur" are forbidden without the test — point to cBioPortal's Mutual Exclusivity tab instead. 3. **Never report a "median" that came from `AVG(...)` or any non-median aggregate.** "Median" and "mean" are different statistics; for skewed clinical distributions (especially survival) they differ substantially. Use ClickHouse's `quantile(0.5)(...)` for actual median, and label arithmetic averages as "mean", never "median". 4. **Never report a hazard ratio, odds ratio, risk ratio, or relative risk** that wasn't computed by an external tool. These require regression / model fitting that ClickHouse does not do. 5. **Never report median overall survival from `AVG(OS_MONTHS)` or even `quantile(0.5)(OS_MONTHS)`.** Median OS requires Kaplan-Meier estimation, which handles censoring (`OS_STATUS = 0:LIVING` means the event hasn't happened yet). Naive medians/means over `OS_MONTHS` ignore censoring and are systematically wrong. The correct handoff: return the raw `(OS_MONTHS, OS_STATUS)` pairs (or descriptive counts: N events, N censored, follow-up range) and tell the user to run KM in R (`survival::survfit`) or Python (`lifelines.KaplanMeierFitter`), or use cBioPortal's Survival comparison. If asked to do any of (1)–(5), respond with the appropriate handoff template from the "Approved Response Templates" section below — do not produce the number. Ambiguous-Term Clarification (before any analysis) -------------------------------------------------- If the user's question uses an ambiguous term, ask before computing anything. Examples: - **"aggressive"** → could mean shorter overall survival, higher metastasis rate, higher grade/stage, higher TMB, or specific molecular features. Ask which definit … (9984 more chars) ▶ read_guide { "uri": "cbioportal://clinical-data-guide" } ▶ read_guide { "uri": "cbioportal://mutation-frequency-guide" } ◀ result # Clinical Data Query Guide ## Overview Clinical data in cBioPortal is stored at both patient and sample levels. Understanding the distinction is crucial for accurate analysis. ## Data Organization ### Patient-Level vs Sample-Level Data - **Patient-level**: Demographics, overall survival, disease stage (stored once per patient) - **Sample-level**: Sample type, sequencing platform, purity (can have multiple per patient) ### Key Tables - `clinical_patient`: Patient-level clinical attributes - `clinical_sample`: Sample-level clinical attributes - `clinical_data_derived`: Pre-joined view combining both levels - `clinical_attribute_meta`: Metadata about available clinical attributes ## Recommended Approach: Use clinical_data_derived The `clinical_data_derived` table is pre-joined and optimized for most queries: ```sql -- Get clinical data for specific attributes SELECT sample_unique_id, patient_unique_id, attribute_name, attribute_value FROM clinical_data_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'your_study_id' AND attribute_name IN ('CANCER_TYPE', 'SAMPLE_TYPE', 'TMB_NONSYNONYMOUS'); ``` ## Clinical Attribute Discovery ### Use clinical_attribute_meta for Discovering Available Attributes **Always start here** to see what clinical attributes are available for a specific study: ```sql -- Discover available clinical attributes for a study SELECT attr_id, description, patient_attribute, cancer_study_id FROM clinical_attribute_meta WHERE cancer_study_id = ( SELECT cancer_study_id FROM cancer_study WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'your_study_id' ) ORDER BY patient_attribute, attr_id; ``` **Key Fields:** - **attr_id**: matches attr_id in clinical_sample/clinical_patient tables - **description**: human-readable description of the attribute - **patient_attribute**: true = patient attribute, false = sample attribute - **cancer_study_id**: links to cancer_study table (filter by study) ## Attribute Semantics and Matching ### Case-Insensitive Matching for Attribute Values Clinical values are free text across studies and may differ only by case. For example, a controlled-looking value such as germline mutation status may appear as `GERMLINE`, `Germline`, or another case variant. When filtering `clinical_data_derived.attribute_value`, use case-insensitive matching unless you have already profiled the exact values in the target study: ```sql -- Correct: case-insensitive clinical value filter SELECT DISTINCT sample_unique_id, patient_unique_id FROM clinical_data_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'your_study_id' AND attribute_name = 'MUTATION_STATUS' AND upper(attribute_value) = 'GERMLINE'; ``` Do not write `attribute_value = 'GERMLINE'` without first checking all distinct values for that attribute in the study. ### Query the Requested Attribute, Not a Proxy Do not infer one clinical attribute from a related subtype or marker. Query the actual requested attribute when it … (17073 more chars) ◀ result # Mutation Frequency Analysis Guide ## IMPORTANT: Reporting Mutation Frequencies - **ALWAYS report frequencies as percentages**, not raw counts: `frequency = (altered_samples / total_profiled_samples) × 100` - For quick frequency lookups, **prefer the TCGA Pan-Cancer Atlas study first**, then offer to expand to other studies - When reporting across multiple studies, show **ranges** (e.g., "TP53 is mutated in 30–60% of samples") rather than a single average - **NEVER** sum mutation events across studies to compute an aggregate frequency — this can exceed 100% due to double-counting - Warn users that samples may overlap across cohorts (e.g., MSK studies may share patients) - **Choose and state the counting unit**: use patient-level frequencies for prevalence/rate questions unless the user explicitly asks for samples; use sample-level frequencies when the user asks about samples. - **For "across cancer types" questions**, jump to the [Cross-Cancer-Type Mutation Frequency](#cross-cancer-type-mutation-frequency) section below — there is one correct recipe and several common wrong ones. ## Counting Unit: Samples vs Patients Before answering any mutation count or frequency question, decide whether the unit is samples or patients and state that choice in the answer. | User wording | Counting unit | |--------------|---------------| | "prevalence", "rate", "fraction of patients", "patients with", "how common is" | Patient-level: `COUNT(DISTINCT patient_unique_id)` | | "samples", "specimens", "biopsies", sample-level cohort composition | Sample-level: `COUNT(DISTINCT sample_unique_id)` | | Ambiguous | Ask, or default to patient-level for prevalence/rate language and say so | ### Cross-study sample-count caveat When an answer touches more than one study and reports a sample count, prepend a one-line caveat: > Sample IDs are unique within cBioPortal study prefixes, not guaranteed biological-sample identifiers across studies; overlapping cohorts can count the same patient/sample more than once. Prefer one of these safer approaches: - Use a shipped `cancer_study_query_preferences` cohort such as `pan_cancer_tcga` or `all_studies_non_redundant`. - Restrict to one named study. - Aggregate by `patient_unique_id` when the biological question is patient prevalence. ## STOP rule: a frequency above 100% means your query is wrong If your query returns a frequency over 100%, **do not try to debug or explain the data inconsistency to the user**. The cause is always one of these query bugs: - Summing mutation events instead of `COUNT(DISTINCT sample_unique_id)` for the numerator - Using a study-wide sample count as the denominator instead of the gene-specific profiled count - Cross-study aggregation where the same biological sample appears under multiple `sample_unique_id` values (e.g., MSK-IMPACT and MSK-CHORD share patients) - **Joining the profiled CTE through `gene_panel` / `gene_panel_list` without a WES branch.** `gene_panel_id = 'WES'` is *not* a row in … (35166 more chars) ▶ clickhouse_run_select_query { "query": "SELECT DISTINCT attribute_name FROM clinical_data_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND upper(attribute_name) LIKE '%SUBTYPE%'" } ◀ result {"rows":[{"attribute_name":"SUBTYPE"}]} ▶ clickhouse_run_select_query { "query": "SELECT DISTINCT attribute_value FROM clinical_data_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND attribute_name = 'SUBTYPE'" } ◀ result {"rows":[{"attribute_value":"BRCA_LumA"},{"attribute_value":"BRCA_Her2"},{"attribute_value":"BRCA_LumB"},{"attribute_value":"BRCA_Normal"},{"attribute_value":"BRCA_Basal"},{}]} ▶ clickhouse_run_select_query { "query": " WITH profiled AS ( SELECT DISTINCT c.patient_unique_id FROM sample_to_gene_panel_derived s JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT sample_unique_id, patient_unique_id FROM clinical_data_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018') c USING (sample_unique_id) WHERE s.cancer_study_identifier = 'brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND s.alteration_type = 'MUTATION_EXTENDED' ), pik3ca_mut AS ( SELECT DISTINCT patient_unique_id FROM genomic_event_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND hugo_gene_symbol = 'PIK3CA' AND variant_type = 'mutation' AND mutation_status != 'UNCALLED' AND off_panel = 0 ), pten_del AS ( SELECT DISTINCT patient_unique_id FROM genomic_event_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND hugo_gene_symbol = 'PTEN' AND variant_type = 'cna' AND cna_alteration = -2 ), subtype AS ( SELECT patient_unique_id, attribute_value AS subtype FROM clinical_data_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND attribute_name = 'SUBTYPE' ), groups AS ( SELECT p.patient_unique_id, (p.patient_unique_id IN (SELECT patient_unique_id FROM pik3ca_mut)) AS has_pik3ca, (p.patient_unique_id IN (SELECT patient_unique_id FROM pten_del)) AS has_pten_del FROM profiled p ) SELECT CASE WHEN has_pik3ca AND has_pten_del THEN 'PIK3CA_mut + PTEN_del' WHEN has_pik3ca AND NOT has_pten_del THEN 'PIK3CA_mut only' END AS group_name, s.subtype, count() AS n_patients FROM groups g JOIN subtype s USING (patient_unique_id) WHERE has_pik3ca = 1 AND s.subtype != '' GROUP BY group_name, s.subtype ORDER BY group_name, n_patients DESC " } ◀ result {"rows":[{"group_name":"PIK3CA_mut + PTEN_del","subtype":"BRCA_LumA","n_patients":3},{"group_name":"PIK3CA_mut + PTEN_del","subtype":"BRCA_LumB","n_patients":2},{"group_name":"PIK3CA_mut + PTEN_del","subtype":"BRCA_Basal","n_patients":1},{"group_name":"PIK3CA_mut only","subtype":"BRCA_LumA","n_patients":234},{"group_name":"PIK3CA_mut only","subtype":"BRCA_LumB","n_patients":57},{"group_name":"PIK3CA_mut only","subtype":"BRCA_Her2","n_patients":26},{"group_name":"PIK3CA_mut only","subtype":"BRCA_Basal","n_patients":11},{"group_name":"PIK3CA_mut only","subtype":"BRCA_Normal","n_patients":8}]} ▶ clickhouse_run_select_query { "query": " WITH profiled AS ( SELECT DISTINCT c.patient_unique_id FROM sample_to_gene_panel_derived s JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT sample_unique_id, patient_unique_id FROM clinical_data_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018') c USING (sample_unique_id) WHERE s.cancer_study_identifier = 'brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND s.alteration_type = 'MUTATION_EXTENDED' ), pik3ca_mut AS ( SELECT DISTINCT patient_unique_id FROM genomic_event_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND hugo_gene_symbol = 'PIK3CA' AND variant_type = 'mutation' AND mutation_status != 'UNCALLED' AND off_panel = 0 ), pten_del AS ( SELECT DISTINCT patient_unique_id FROM genomic_event_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND hugo_gene_symbol = 'PTEN' AND variant_type = 'cna' AND cna_alteration = -2 ), subtype AS ( SELECT patient_unique_id, attribute_value AS subtype FROM clinical_data_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND attribute_name = 'SUBTYPE' ), groups AS ( SELECT p.patient_unique_id, (p.patient_unique_id IN (SELECT patient_unique_id FROM pik3ca_mut)) AS has_pik3ca, (p.patient_unique_id IN (SELECT patient_unique_id FROM pten_del)) AS has_pten_del FROM profiled p ) SELECT CASE WHEN has_pik3ca AND has_pten_del THEN 'PIK3CA_mut + PTEN_del' WHEN has_pik3ca AND NOT has_pten_del THEN 'PIK3CA_mut only' END AS group_name, countIf(s.subtype = 'BRCA_LumA') AS n_luma, count() AS n_total_with_subtype FROM groups g JOIN subtype s USING (patient_unique_id) WHERE has_pik3ca = 1 AND s.subtype != '' GROUP BY group_name " } ◀ result {"rows":[{"group_name":"PIK3CA_mut only","n_luma":234,"n_total_with_subtype":336},{"group_name":"PIK3CA_mut + PTEN_del","n_luma":3,"n_total_with_subtype":6}]} ▶ resolve_and_route { "studyIds": [ "brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018" ] } ◀ result {"success":true,"message":"Found 1 study. Use the metadata to call the appropriate navigation tool(s).","data":{"totalCount":1,"studiesWithMetadata":[{"studyId":"brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","name":"Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas)","sampleCount":1084,"studyViewUrl":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study?id=brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","metadata":{"clinicalAttributeIds":["AGE","AJCC_PATHOLOGIC_TUMOR_STAGE","AJCC_STAGING_EDITION","ANEUPLOIDY_SCORE","BUFFA_HYPOXIA_SCORE","CANCER_TYPE","CANCER_TYPE_ACRONYM","CANCER_TYPE_DETAILED","DAYS_LAST_FOLLOWUP","DAYS_TO_BIRTH","DAYS_TO_INITIAL_PATHOLOGIC_DIAGNOSIS","DFS_MONTHS","DFS_STATUS","DSS_MONTHS","DSS_STATUS","ETHNICITY","FORM_COMPLETION_DATE","FRACTION_GENOME_ALTERED","GENETIC_ANCESTRY_LABEL","GRADE","HISTORY_NEOADJUVANT_TRTYN","ICD_10","ICD_O_3_HISTOLOGY","ICD_O_3_SITE","INFORMED_CONSENT_VERIFIED","IN_PANCANPATHWAYS_FREEZE","MSI_SCORE_MANTIS","MSI_SENSOR_SCORE","MUTATION_COUNT","NEW_TUMOR_EVENT_AFTER_INITIAL_TREATMENT","ONCOTREE_CODE","OS_MONTHS","OS_STATUS","OTHER_PATIENT_ID","PATH_M_STAGE","PATH_N_STAGE","PATH_T_STAGE","PERSON_NEOPLASM_CANCER_STATUS","PFS_MONTHS","PFS_STATUS","PRIMARY_LYMPH_NODE_PRESENTATION_ASSESSMENT","PRIOR_DX","RACE","RADIATION_THERAPY","RAGNUM_HYPOXIA_SCORE","SAMPLE_COUNT","SAMPLE_TYPE","SEX","SOMATIC_STATUS","SUBTYPE","TBL_SCORE","TISSUE_PROSPECTIVE_COLLECTION_INDICATOR","TISSUE_RETROSPECTIVE_COLLECTION_INDICATOR","TISSUE_SOURCE_SITE","TISSUE_SOURCE_SITE_CODE","TMB_NONSYNONYMOUS","TUMOR_TISSUE_SITE","TUMOR_TYPE","WEIGHT","WINTER_HYPOXIA_SCORE"],"molecularProfileIds":["brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_gistic","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_log2CNA","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_mutations","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_protein_quantification","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_protein_quantification_zscores","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_Zscores","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_all_sample_Zscores","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_all_sample_ref_normal_Zscores","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rppa","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rppa_Zscores","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_structural_variants"],"genericAssayProfiles":["brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_armlevel_cna","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_genetic_ancestry","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_methylation_hm27_hm450_merge","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_methylation_hm450","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_phosphoprotein_quantification"],"heatmapProfileIds":["brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_protein_quantification_zscores","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_Zscores","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_all_sample_Zscores","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_all_sample_ref_normal_Zscores","brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rppa_Zscores"],"availableComparisonTabs":["overlap","clinical","survival","alterations","mutations","mrna","protein","generic_assay_armlevel_cna","generic_assay_genetic_anc … (83 more chars) ▶ navigate_to_group_comparison { "studyIds": [ "brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018" ], "groups": [ { "name": "PIK3CA-mut + PTEN-del", "studyViewFilter": { "geneFilters": [ { "molecularProfileIds": [ "brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_mutations" ], "geneQueries": [ [ { "hugoGeneSymbol": "PIK3CA" } ] ] }, { "molecularProfileIds": [ "brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_gistic" ], "geneQueries": [ [ { "hugoGeneSymbol": "PTEN", "alterations": [ "HOMDEL" ] } ] ] } ] } }, { "name": "PIK3CA-mut only (no PTEN del)", "studyViewFilter": { "geneFilters": [ { "molecularProfileIds": [ "brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_mutations" ], "geneQueries": [ [ { "hugoGeneSymbol": "PIK3CA" } ] ] } ], "genomicDataFilters": [ { "hugoGeneSymbol": "PTEN", "profileType": "gistic", "values": [ { "value": "-1" }, { "value": "0" }, { "value": "1" }, { "value": "2" } ] } ] } } ], "tab": "clinical" } ◀ result {"success":true,"message":"Navigating to https://www.cbioportal.org/comparison/clinical?comparisonId=6ab5c10fc2115c492d884df9","url":"https://www.cbioportal.org/comparison/clinical?comparisonId=6ab5c10fc2115c492d884df9","data":{"description":"Group comparison (2 custom groups)","studies":["brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018"],"totalGroups":2,"groups":[{"name":"PIK3CA-mut + PTEN-del","sampleCount":6},{"name":"PIK3CA-mut only (no PTEN del)","sampleCount":339}],"studyViewUrl":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study?id=brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","groupUrls":[{"groupName":"PIK3CA-mut + PTEN-del","url":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study?id=brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018#filterJson=%7B%22geneFilters%22%3A%5B%7B%22molecularProfileIds%22%3A%5B%22brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_mutations%22%5D%2C%22geneQueries%22%3A%5B%5B%7B%22hugoGeneSymbol%22%3A%22PIK3CA%22%7D%5D%5D%7D%2C%7B%22molecularProfileIds%22%3A%5B%22brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_gistic%22%5D%2C%22geneQueries%22%3A%5B%5B%7B%22hugoGeneSymbol%22%3A%22PTEN%22%2C%22alterations%22%3A%5B%22HOMDEL%22%5D%7D%5D%5D%7D%5D%7D"},{"groupName":"PIK3CA-mut only (no PTEN del)","url":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study?id=brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018#filterJson=%7B%22geneFilters%22%3A%5B%7B%22molecularProfileIds%22%3A%5B%22brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_mutations%22%5D%2C%22geneQueries%22%3A%5B%5B%7B%22hugoGeneSymbol%22%3A%22PIK3CA%22%7D%5D%5D%7D%5D%2C%22genomicDataFilters%22%3A%5B%7B%22hugoGeneSymbol%22%3A%22PTEN%22%2C%22profileType%22%3A%22gistic%22%2C%22values%22%3A%5B%7B%22value%22%3A%22-1%22%7D%2C%7B%22value%22%3A%220%22%7D%2C%7B%22value%22%3A%221%22%7D%2C%7B%22value%22%3A%222%22%7D%5D%7D%5D%7D"}],"pageDescription":"Clinical attribute distributions compared across PIK3CA-mut + PTEN-del (6) vs PIK3CA-mut only (no PTEN del) (339)."}} ═ answer (success) Group sizes (6 vs. 339) closely match my manual counts (6 vs. 336 with subtype data available). ### [View Group Comparison — Clinical (PAM50 Subtype)](https://www.cbioportal.org/comparison/clinical?comparisonId=6ab5c10fc2115c492d884df9) Clinical attribute distributions compared across PIK3CA-mut + PTEN-del (6) vs PIK3CA-mut only (no PTEN del) (339). Open the **Clinical** tab and select `SUBTYPE` to see the Luminal A proportion with cBioPortal's built-in chi-squared test and exact p-value — something ClickHouse itself cannot compute. **Caveat:** the co-mutant group is extremely small (n=6), so any statistical comparison will be underpowered — treat the 50% vs. 69.6% difference as descriptive, not confirmed significant, until you check the p-value on that page.