Q (sonnet): Which cancer type has the highest average tumor mutational burden across all studies? ▶ read_guide { "uri": "cbioportal://clinical-data-guide" } ▶ read_guide { "uri": "cbioportal://mutation-frequency-guide" } ◀ result # Clinical Data Query Guide ## Overview Clinical data in cBioPortal is stored at both patient and sample levels. Understanding the distinction is crucial for accurate analysis. ## Data Organization ### Patient-Level vs Sample-Level Data - **Patient-level**: Demographics, overall survival, disease stage (stored once per patient) - **Sample-level**: Sample type, sequencing platform, purity (can have multiple per patient) ### Key Tables - `clinical_patient`: Patient-level clinical attributes - `clinical_sample`: Sample-level clinical attributes - `clinical_data_derived`: Pre-joined view combining both levels - `clinical_attribute_meta`: Metadata about available clinical attributes ## Recommended Approach: Use clinical_data_derived The `clinical_data_derived` table is pre-joined and optimized for most queries: ```sql -- Get clinical data for specific attributes SELECT sample_unique_id, patient_unique_id, attribute_name, attribute_value FROM clinical_data_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'your_study_id' AND attribute_name IN ('CANCER_TYPE', 'SAMPLE_TYPE', 'TMB_NONSYNONYMOUS'); ``` ## Clinical Attribute Discovery ### Use clinical_attribute_meta for Discovering Available Attributes **Always start here** to see what clinical attributes are available for a specific study: ```sql -- Discover available clinical attributes for a study SELECT attr_id, description, patient_attribute, cancer_study_id FROM clinical_attribute_meta WHERE cancer_study_id = ( SELECT cancer_study_id FROM cancer_study WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'your_study_id' ) ORDER BY patient_attribute, attr_id; ``` **Key Fields:** - **attr_id**: matches attr_id in clinical_sample/clinical_patient tables - **description**: human-readable description of the attribute - **patient_attribute**: true = patient attribute, false = sample attribute - **cancer_study_id**: links to cancer_study table (filter by study) ## Attribute Semantics and Matching ### Case-Insensitive Matching for Attribute Values Clinical values are free text across studies and may differ only by case. For example, a controlled-looking value such as germline mutation status may appear as `GERMLINE`, `Germline`, or another case variant. When filtering `clinical_data_derived.attribute_value`, use case-insensitive matching unless you have already profiled the exact values in the target study: ```sql -- Correct: case-insensitive clinical value filter SELECT DISTINCT sample_unique_id, patient_unique_id FROM clinical_data_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'your_study_id' AND attribute_name = 'MUTATION_STATUS' AND upper(attribute_value) = 'GERMLINE'; ``` Do not write `attribute_value = 'GERMLINE'` without first checking all distinct values for that attribute in the study. ### Query the Requested Attribute, Not a Proxy Do not infer one clinical attribute from a related subtype or marker. Query the actual requested attribute when it … (17073 more chars) ◀ result # Mutation Frequency Analysis Guide ## IMPORTANT: Reporting Mutation Frequencies - **ALWAYS report frequencies as percentages**, not raw counts: `frequency = (altered_samples / total_profiled_samples) × 100` - For quick frequency lookups, **prefer the TCGA Pan-Cancer Atlas study first**, then offer to expand to other studies - When reporting across multiple studies, show **ranges** (e.g., "TP53 is mutated in 30–60% of samples") rather than a single average - **NEVER** sum mutation events across studies to compute an aggregate frequency — this can exceed 100% due to double-counting - Warn users that samples may overlap across cohorts (e.g., MSK studies may share patients) - **Choose and state the counting unit**: use patient-level frequencies for prevalence/rate questions unless the user explicitly asks for samples; use sample-level frequencies when the user asks about samples. - **For "across cancer types" questions**, jump to the [Cross-Cancer-Type Mutation Frequency](#cross-cancer-type-mutation-frequency) section below — there is one correct recipe and several common wrong ones. ## Counting Unit: Samples vs Patients Before answering any mutation count or frequency question, decide whether the unit is samples or patients and state that choice in the answer. | User wording | Counting unit | |--------------|---------------| | "prevalence", "rate", "fraction of patients", "patients with", "how common is" | Patient-level: `COUNT(DISTINCT patient_unique_id)` | | "samples", "specimens", "biopsies", sample-level cohort composition | Sample-level: `COUNT(DISTINCT sample_unique_id)` | | Ambiguous | Ask, or default to patient-level for prevalence/rate language and say so | ### Cross-study sample-count caveat When an answer touches more than one study and reports a sample count, prepend a one-line caveat: > Sample IDs are unique within cBioPortal study prefixes, not guaranteed biological-sample identifiers across studies; overlapping cohorts can count the same patient/sample more than once. Prefer one of these safer approaches: - Use a shipped `cancer_study_query_preferences` cohort such as `pan_cancer_tcga` or `all_studies_non_redundant`. - Restrict to one named study. - Aggregate by `patient_unique_id` when the biological question is patient prevalence. ## STOP rule: a frequency above 100% means your query is wrong If your query returns a frequency over 100%, **do not try to debug or explain the data inconsistency to the user**. The cause is always one of these query bugs: - Summing mutation events instead of `COUNT(DISTINCT sample_unique_id)` for the numerator - Using a study-wide sample count as the denominator instead of the gene-specific profiled count - Cross-study aggregation where the same biological sample appears under multiple `sample_unique_id` values (e.g., MSK-IMPACT and MSK-CHORD share patients) - **Joining the profiled CTE through `gene_panel` / `gene_panel_list` without a WES branch.** `gene_panel_id = 'WES'` is *not* a row in … (35166 more chars) ▶ clickhouse_run_select_query { "query": "SELECT cancer_study_identifier AS study, count(v) AS n, round(avg(v), 2) AS mean_tmb, round(quantile(0.5)(v), 2) AS median_tmb FROM ( SELECT cancer_study_identifier, toFloat64OrNull(attribute_value) AS v FROM clinical_data_derived WHERE attribute_name = 'TMB_NONSYNONYMOUS' AND cancer_study_identifier IN (SELECT cancer_study_identifier FROM cancer_study_query_preferences WHERE preference_name = 'pan_cancer_tcga') ) WHERE v IS NOT NULL GROUP BY study ORDER BY mean_tmb DESC", "max_rows": 40 } ◀ result {"rows":[{"study":"ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":517,"mean_tmb":35.66,"median_tmb":2.57},{"study":"skcm_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":440,"mean_tmb":25.91,"median_tmb":14.88},{"study":"coadread_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":534,"mean_tmb":13.64,"median_tmb":3.5},{"study":"stad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":436,"mean_tmb":12.69,"median_tmb":3.9},{"study":"luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":566,"mean_tmb":10.02,"median_tmb":6.68},{"study":"lusc_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":484,"mean_tmb":9.43,"median_tmb":7.67},{"study":"blca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":410,"mean_tmb":8.44,"median_tmb":5.77},{"study":"cesc_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":291,"mean_tmb":6.48,"median_tmb":2.83},{"study":"hnsc_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":515,"mean_tmb":5.41,"median_tmb":3.53},{"study":"esca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":182,"mean_tmb":4.87,"median_tmb":3.53},{"study":"ucs_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":57,"mean_tmb":4.28,"median_tmb":1.57},{"study":"dlbc_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":41,"mean_tmb":3.96,"median_tmb":3.6},{"study":"gbm_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":397,"mean_tmb":3.89,"median_tmb":1.7},{"study":"paad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":179,"mean_tmb":3.89,"median_tmb":1.17},{"study":"lihc_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":366,"mean_tmb":3.52,"median_tmb":2.83},{"study":"acc_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":91,"mean_tmb":2.78,"median_tmb":0.9},{"study":"brca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":1066,"mean_tmb":2.73,"median_tmb":1.3},{"study":"kirp_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":276,"mean_tmb":2.73,"median_tmb":2.23},{"study":"chol_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":36,"mean_tmb":2.32,"median_tmb":1.45},{"study":"ov_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":523,"mean_tmb":2.31,"median_tmb":1.87},{"study":"sarc_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":255,"mean_tmb":2.31,"median_tmb":1.3},{"study":"kirc_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":402,"mean_tmb":1.77,"median_tmb":1.67},{"study":"lgg_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":514,"mean_tmb":1.77,"median_tmb":0.93},{"study":"prad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":494,"mean_tmb":1.56,"median_tmb":0.9},{"study":"laml_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":200,"mean_tmb":1.28,"median_tmb":0.53},{"study":"kich_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":65,"mean_tmb":1.09,"median_tmb":0.67},{"study":"meso_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":86,"mean_tmb":0.98,"median_tmb":0.88},{"study":"thym_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":123,"mean_tmb":0.74,"median_tmb":0.47},{"study":"uvm_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":80,"mean_tmb":0.56,"median_tmb":0.4},{"study":"thca_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":490,"mean_tmb":0.54,"median_tmb":0.33},{"study":"tgct_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":149,"mean_tmb":0.49,"median_tmb":0.4},{"study":"pcpg_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","n":178,"mean_tmb":0.34,"median_tmb":0.3}]} ▶ resolve_and_route { "studyIds": [ "ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018", "skcm_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018", "coadread_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018", "luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018" ] } ◀ result {"success":true,"message":"Found 4 matching studies. Pick the best match (prefer TCGA → prefer PanCancer Atlas), use its metadata to call the appropriate navigation tool(s) and generate URLs immediately. Present other studies as alternatives.","data":{"totalCount":4,"studiesWithMetadata":[{"studyId":"ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","name":"Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas)","sampleCount":529,"studyViewUrl":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study?id=ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","metadata":{"clinicalAttributeIds":["AGE","AJCC_PATHOLOGIC_TUMOR_STAGE","AJCC_STAGING_EDITION","ANEUPLOIDY_SCORE","BUFFA_HYPOXIA_SCORE","CANCER_TYPE","CANCER_TYPE_ACRONYM","CANCER_TYPE_DETAILED","DAYS_LAST_FOLLOWUP","DAYS_TO_BIRTH","DAYS_TO_INITIAL_PATHOLOGIC_DIAGNOSIS","DFS_MONTHS","DFS_STATUS","DSS_MONTHS","DSS_STATUS","ETHNICITY","FORM_COMPLETION_DATE","FRACTION_GENOME_ALTERED","GENETIC_ANCESTRY_LABEL","GRADE","HISTORY_NEOADJUVANT_TRTYN","ICD_10","ICD_O_3_HISTOLOGY","ICD_O_3_SITE","INFORMED_CONSENT_VERIFIED","IN_PANCANPATHWAYS_FREEZE","MSI_SCORE_MANTIS","MSI_SENSOR_SCORE","MUTATION_COUNT","NEW_TUMOR_EVENT_AFTER_INITIAL_TREATMENT","ONCOTREE_CODE","OS_MONTHS","OS_STATUS","OTHER_PATIENT_ID","PATH_M_STAGE","PATH_N_STAGE","PATH_T_STAGE","PERSON_NEOPLASM_CANCER_STATUS","PFS_MONTHS","PFS_STATUS","PRIMARY_LYMPH_NODE_PRESENTATION_ASSESSMENT","PRIOR_DX","RACE","RADIATION_THERAPY","RAGNUM_HYPOXIA_SCORE","SAMPLE_COUNT","SAMPLE_TYPE","SEX","SOMATIC_STATUS","SUBTYPE","TBL_SCORE","TISSUE_PROSPECTIVE_COLLECTION_INDICATOR","TISSUE_RETROSPECTIVE_COLLECTION_INDICATOR","TISSUE_SOURCE_SITE","TISSUE_SOURCE_SITE_CODE","TMB_NONSYNONYMOUS","TUMOR_TISSUE_SITE","TUMOR_TYPE","WEIGHT","WINTER_HYPOXIA_SCORE"],"molecularProfileIds":["ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_gistic","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_log2CNA","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_mutations","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_Zscores","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_all_sample_Zscores","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_all_sample_ref_normal_Zscores","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rppa","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rppa_Zscores","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_structural_variants"],"genericAssayProfiles":["ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_armlevel_cna","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_genetic_ancestry","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_methylation_hm27_hm450_merge","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_methylation_hm450"],"heatmapProfileIds":["ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_Zscores","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_all_sample_Zscores","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_all_sample_ref_normal_Zscores","ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rppa_Zscores"],"availableComparisonTabs":["overlap","clinical","survival","alterations","mutations","mrna","protein","generic_assay_armlevel_cna","generic_assay_genetic_ancestry","generic_assay_methylation"]}},{"studyId":"skcm_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","name":"S … (7989 more chars) ═ answer (success) Explore the two leading cancer types directly: - [Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma — StudyView (highest mean TMB)](https://www.cbioportal.org/study?id=ucec_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018) — 529 samples - [Skin Cutaneous Melanoma — StudyView (highest median TMB)](https://www.cbioportal.org/study?id=skcm_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018) — 448 samples Both StudyView pages let you plot the `TMB_NONSYNONYMOUS` distribution directly (Summary tab → Mutation Count/TMB chart) to see the skew for yourself. **Summary:** "Highest average TMB" depends on whether you mean mean or median. **UCEC (endometrial cancer)** has the highest mean (35.7 mut/Mb) because a minority of hypermutated (POLE-mutant/MSI) tumors pull the average way up — its median is only 2.6. **Melanoma (SKCM)** has the highest median (14.9 mut/Mb) and is the more defensible answer if "average" is meant to reflect a typical tumor in that type, since UV-driven mutagenesis elevates TMB broadly across the cohort rather than in a small subset.