Q (sonnet): What is the median survival time in the Pediatric Neuroblastoma study from TARGET?

▶ read_guide
{
 "uri": "cbioportal://statistical-tests-guide"
}

▶ list_studies
{
 "search": "neuroblastoma TARGET"
}

◀ result
Statistical Test Selection Guide
================================

Purpose
-------
This guide ensures the correct statistical test is selected before performing any group comparison, matching cBioPortal's own Group Comparison defaults.

HARD RULES — NEVER FABRICATE A STATISTIC
----------------------------------------
ClickHouse cannot run statistical tests. The agent therefore must NEVER produce a derived statistic that is not a literal column value from a SQL result. Specifically:

1. **Never invent a p-value.** Not "p < 0.001", not "p ≈ 0.05", not any p-value. If the user asks "what is the p-value?", the answer is *"I can't compute that — here is the 2x2 contingency table (or group statistics). Run it in cBioPortal's Group Comparison tab, in R with `fisher.test(...)` / `wilcox.test(...)`, or in Python with `scipy.stats.fisher_exact(...)` / `mannwhitneyu(...)`."*
2. **Never claim mutual exclusivity (or co-occurrence) from a contingency table alone.** A 2x2 table is not a test. The shape "altered/not altered × group A/group B" needs Fisher's exact + a defined direction (odds ratio < 1 with significant p). Without that test, the agent presents the table and stops. Descriptive phrasing is also a claim: "largely/mostly mutually exclusive", "rarely co-occur", "tend to co-occur" are forbidden without the test — point to cBioPortal's Mutual Exclusivity tab instead.
3. **Never report a "median" that came from `AVG(...)` or any non-median aggregate.** "Median" and "mean" are different statistics; for skewed clinical distributions (especially survival) they differ substantially. Use ClickHouse's `quantile(0.5)(...)` for actual median, and label arithmetic averages as "mean", never "median".
4. **Never report a hazard ratio, odds ratio, risk ratio, or relative risk** that wasn't computed by an external tool. These require regression / model fitting that ClickHouse does not do.
5. **Never report median overall survival from `AVG(OS_MONTHS)` or even `quantile(0.5)(OS_MONTHS)`.** Median OS requires Kaplan-Meier estimation, which handles censoring (`OS_STATUS = 0:LIVING` means the event hasn't happened yet). Naive medians/means over `OS_MONTHS` ignore censoring and are systematically wrong. The correct handoff: return the raw `(OS_MONTHS, OS_STATUS)` pairs (or descriptive counts: N events, N censored, follow-up range) and tell the user to run KM in R (`survival::survfit`) or Python (`lifelines.KaplanMeierFitter`), or use cBioPortal's Survival comparison.

If asked to do any of (1)–(5), respond with the appropriate handoff template from the "Approved Response Templates" section below — do not produce the number.

Ambiguous-Term Clarification (before any analysis)
--------------------------------------------------
If the user's question uses an ambiguous term, ask before computing anything. Examples:

- **"aggressive"** → could mean shorter overall survival, higher metastasis rate, higher grade/stage, higher TMB, or specific molecular features. Ask which definit … (9984 more chars)

◀ result
{"result":[{"cancer_study_identifier":"nbl_target_2018_pub","name":"Pediatric Neuroblastoma (TARGET, 2018)","type_of_cancer_id":"nbl","sample_count":1089,"has_guide":false,"url":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study/summary?id=nbl_target_2018_pub"},{"cancer_study_identifier":"nbl_target_gdc","name":"Neuroblastoma (TARGET GDC, 2025)","type_of_cancer_id":"nbl","sample_count":533,"has_guide":false,"url":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study/summary?id=nbl_target_gdc"},{"cancer_study_identifier":"nbl_msk_2023","name":"Pediatric Neuroblastoma (MSK, Nat Genet 2023)","type_of_cancer_id":"nbl","sample_count":223,"has_guide":false,"url":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study/summary?id=nbl_msk_2023"}]}

═ answer (success)
There are two matching TARGET neuroblastoma studies — I'll ask before proceeding, per the disambiguation rule:

- **Pediatric Neuroblastoma (TARGET, 2018)** — `nbl_target_2018_pub`, 1,089 samples
- **Neuroblastoma (TARGET GDC, 2025)** — `nbl_target_gdc`, 533 samples

Which one would you like — or should I report both?

Also, one important note regardless of which you pick: **median survival cannot be computed as a simple average or raw median of survival months** — it requires Kaplan-Meier estimation to correctly account for patients still alive at last follow-up (censoring). ClickHouse can't run that calculation. What I *can* do is:

1. Pull the raw counts for your chosen study — total patients, number of deaths (events), number censored (alive at last follow-up), and follow-up range — and
2. Hand you off to cBioPortal's Survival tab, which computes the actual Kaplan-Meier median for you (and I can generate a direct link to it).

Let me know which study (or both), and I'll pull the summary numbers and the Survival tab link.