Q (sonnet): Do lung adenocarcinoma patients with high EGFR mRNA expression (top quartile) have different survival outcomes than those with low expression? ▶ read_guide { "uri": "cbioportal://statistical-tests-guide" } ▶ read_guide { "uri": "cbioportal://gene-expression-guide" } ◀ result Statistical Test Selection Guide ================================ Purpose ------- This guide ensures the correct statistical test is selected before performing any group comparison, matching cBioPortal's own Group Comparison defaults. HARD RULES — NEVER FABRICATE A STATISTIC ---------------------------------------- ClickHouse cannot run statistical tests. The agent therefore must NEVER produce a derived statistic that is not a literal column value from a SQL result. Specifically: 1. **Never invent a p-value.** Not "p < 0.001", not "p ≈ 0.05", not any p-value. If the user asks "what is the p-value?", the answer is *"I can't compute that — here is the 2x2 contingency table (or group statistics). Run it in cBioPortal's Group Comparison tab, in R with `fisher.test(...)` / `wilcox.test(...)`, or in Python with `scipy.stats.fisher_exact(...)` / `mannwhitneyu(...)`."* 2. **Never claim mutual exclusivity (or co-occurrence) from a contingency table alone.** A 2x2 table is not a test. The shape "altered/not altered × group A/group B" needs Fisher's exact + a defined direction (odds ratio < 1 with significant p). Without that test, the agent presents the table and stops. Descriptive phrasing is also a claim: "largely/mostly mutually exclusive", "rarely co-occur", "tend to co-occur" are forbidden without the test — point to cBioPortal's Mutual Exclusivity tab instead. 3. **Never report a "median" that came from `AVG(...)` or any non-median aggregate.** "Median" and "mean" are different statistics; for skewed clinical distributions (especially survival) they differ substantially. Use ClickHouse's `quantile(0.5)(...)` for actual median, and label arithmetic averages as "mean", never "median". 4. **Never report a hazard ratio, odds ratio, risk ratio, or relative risk** that wasn't computed by an external tool. These require regression / model fitting that ClickHouse does not do. 5. **Never report median overall survival from `AVG(OS_MONTHS)` or even `quantile(0.5)(OS_MONTHS)`.** Median OS requires Kaplan-Meier estimation, which handles censoring (`OS_STATUS = 0:LIVING` means the event hasn't happened yet). Naive medians/means over `OS_MONTHS` ignore censoring and are systematically wrong. The correct handoff: return the raw `(OS_MONTHS, OS_STATUS)` pairs (or descriptive counts: N events, N censored, follow-up range) and tell the user to run KM in R (`survival::survfit`) or Python (`lifelines.KaplanMeierFitter`), or use cBioPortal's Survival comparison. If asked to do any of (1)–(5), respond with the appropriate handoff template from the "Approved Response Templates" section below — do not produce the number. Ambiguous-Term Clarification (before any analysis) -------------------------------------------------- If the user's question uses an ambiguous term, ask before computing anything. Examples: - **"aggressive"** → could mean shorter overall survival, higher metastasis rate, higher grade/stage, higher TMB, or specific molecular features. Ask which definit … (9984 more chars) ▶ list_studies { "search": "lung adenocarcinoma TCGA" } ◀ result # Gene Expression Analysis Guide This guide covers continuous-value genomic data: gene **expression**, **copy number** values, **methylation**, and related profile types. Mutation/CNA/SV *frequency* analysis lives in `cbioportal://mutation-frequency-guide`. ## Where this data lives Continuous per-sample-per-gene values are stored in `genetic_alteration_derived`: | Column | Description | |---|---| | `sample_unique_id` | `_` | | `cancer_study_identifier` | study scope | | `hugo_gene_symbol` | gene | | `profile_type` | which assay/normalization (see below) | | `alteration_value` | the actual value — stored as Nullable(String); cast with `toFloat64OrNull` | `alteration_value` is a string because the same column hosts many different value scales. The `''` and `'NA'` sentinels mean "missing"; always filter them out and use `toFloat64OrNull(alteration_value) IS NOT NULL` for downstream math. ## Discovering profile types for a study Different studies expose different profile types depending on what assays were run and how the data was normalized. Always check what a specific study supports before picking one: ```sql SELECT DISTINCT profile_type FROM genetic_alteration_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'brca_metabric' ORDER BY profile_type; ``` Common values across the public portal: | Family | Profile types | |---|---| | mRNA expression | `rna_seq_v2_mrna`, `rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_Zscores`, `rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_all_sample_Zscores` (TCGA PanCancer Atlas), `mrna`, `mrna_median_Zscores`, `mrna_seq_v2_rsem`, `mrna_seq_v2_rsem_Zscores`, `mrna_seq_cpm`, `mrna_seq_fpkm`, `mrna_U133`, `mrna_outliers` | | Copy number (continuous) | `cna`, `linear_CNA`, `log2CNA`, `cna_consensus`, `cna_rae`, `gistic` | | Methylation | `methylation_hm27`, `methylation_hm450`, `methylation_epic`, `methylation_promoters_rrbs` | | miRNA | `mirna`, `mirna_median_Zscores` | | Protein | `protein_quantification`, `protein_level`, `RPPA` | **Z-score vs raw choice.** When the user asks "is X correlated with Y", either works for Spearman (rank-based) — Pearson would care. Default to the non-Z-score variant if both exist, and call out which one in the response. ## Canonical recipe — Spearman correlation between two genes ```sql SELECT * FROM gene_pair_coexpression( study = 'brca_metabric', gene_a = 'TP53', gene_b = 'MYC', profile_type = 'mrna' ); ``` Returns one row: `(gene_a, gene_b, profile_type, spearman_correlation, num_samples)`. - `spearman_correlation` in [−1, 1]; `NULL` when fewer than 3 valid paired samples. - Mirrors cbioportal-backend's `ClickhouseCoExpressionMapper.getCoExpressions`, simplified to a pair lookup (the backend computes one ref gene vs ALL other genes for the coexpression page; here the agent asks about a specific pair). ### Verified examples | Study | gene_a | gene_b | profile_type | spearman | n | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | `brca_metabric` | TP53 | MYC | `mrna` | 0.118 | 1980 | | … (4931 more chars) ◀ result {"result":[{"cancer_study_identifier":"luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","name":"Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas)","type_of_cancer_id":"luad","sample_count":566,"has_guide":true,"url":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study/summary?id=luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018"},{"cancer_study_identifier":"luad_tcga","name":"Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, Firehose Legacy)","type_of_cancer_id":"luad","sample_count":586,"has_guide":false,"url":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study/summary?id=luad_tcga"},{"cancer_study_identifier":"luad_tcga_gdc","name":"Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA GDC, 2025)","type_of_cancer_id":"luad","sample_count":571,"has_guide":false,"url":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study/summary?id=luad_tcga_gdc"},{"cancer_study_identifier":"luad_tcga_pub","name":"Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, Nature 2014)","type_of_cancer_id":"luad","sample_count":230,"has_guide":false,"url":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study/summary?id=luad_tcga_pub"}]} ▶ get_study_guide { "study_id": "luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018" } ◀ result # Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas) **Study ID:** `luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018` See `_tcga_pancan_template.md` for common TCGA clinical attributes. ## Study-Specific Attributes ### Not available in this study - **Smoking history / pack-years**: no smoking attribute. Say smoking status is not available here rather than inferring it. - **EGFR / KRAS / ALK status**: no clinical status attributes. Derive EGFR and KRAS status from mutation data, and ALK fusions from structural-variant data (5 samples with an ALK SV in `genomic_event_derived`). - `SUBTYPE` is `LUAD` (502) or blank (64) and carries no molecular subtype. `GRADE` is blank for all samples. ## Key Genes - Driver Mutations | Gene | Frequency | Notes | |------|-----------|-------| | KRAS | ~30% | G12C targetable with sotorasib/adagrasib | | EGFR | ~15% | L858R, exon 19 del targetable with TKIs | | ALK | ~5% | Fusions targetable with crizotinib, etc. | | BRAF | ~5% | V600E targetable | | ROS1 | ~2% | Fusions targetable | | RET | ~2% | Fusions targetable | | MET | ~3% | Exon 14 skipping, amplification | ## Notes - Driver mutations are largely mutually exclusive - STK11 and KEAP1 mutations associated with poor immunotherapy response ▶ clickhouse_list_table_columns { "table": "genetic_alteration_derived" } ◀ result {"columns":[{"name":"sample_unique_id","type":"String"},{"name":"cancer_study_identifier","type":"LowCardinality(String)"},{"name":"hugo_gene_symbol","type":"String"},{"name":"profile_type","type":"LowCardinality(String)"},{"name":"alteration_value","type":"Nullable(String)"}]} ▶ clickhouse_list_table_columns { "table": "clinical_data_derived" } ◀ result {"columns":[{"name":"internal_id","type":"Int32"},{"name":"sample_unique_id","type":"String","comment":"Globally unique sample ID: cancer_study_identifier + \"_\" + sample.stable_id. Empty for patient-level attributes. Use this for sample filtering and joins."},{"name":"patient_unique_id","type":"String","comment":"Globally unique patient ID: cancer_study_identifier + \"_\" + patient.stable_id. Present for both sample and patient-level attributes."},{"name":"attribute_name","type":"LowCardinality(String)","comment":"Clinical attribute name (e.g., SAMPLE_TYPE, CANCER_TYPE, AGE, OS_MONTHS). Use with attribute_value for filtering. AGE may be floored or capped for de-identification (e.g. all children recorded as 18, or everyone 89+ recorded as 89 or 90): before age statistics check for a pile-up at the min/max, and if present compute age from DAYS_TO_BIRTH (-days / 365.25)."},{"name":"attribute_value","type":"String","comment":"Value of the clinical attribute (String). For SAMPLE_TYPE: Primary, Metastasis, Local Recurrence, Unknown. Missing values are empty strings, so use toFloat64OrNull(attribute_value) for numeric comparisons — CAST fails on them."},{"name":"cancer_study_identifier","type":"LowCardinality(String)"},{"name":"type","type":"LowCardinality(String)","comment":"Data level: \"sample\" for sample-level attributes (e.g., SAMPLE_TYPE), \"patient\" for patient-level attributes (e.g., AGE, OS_MONTHS)."}]} ▶ clickhouse_run_select_query { "query": " SELECT quantile(0.25)(toFloat64OrNull(alteration_value)) AS q25, quantile(0.75)(toFloat64OrNull(alteration_value)) AS q75, count() AS n FROM genetic_alteration_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND hugo_gene_symbol = 'EGFR' AND profile_type = 'rna_seq_v2_mrna' AND alteration_value NOT IN ('', 'NA') AND toFloat64OrNull(alteration_value) IS NOT NULL " } ◀ result {"rows":[{"q25":539.147,"q75":1766.0475000000001,"n":510}]} ▶ clickhouse_run_select_query { "query": " WITH egfr AS ( SELECT sample_unique_id, toFloat64OrNull(alteration_value) AS expr FROM genetic_alteration_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND hugo_gene_symbol = 'EGFR' AND profile_type = 'rna_seq_v2_mrna' AND alteration_value NOT IN ('', 'NA') AND toFloat64OrNull(alteration_value) IS NOT NULL ), ranked AS ( SELECT sample_unique_id, expr, ntile(4) OVER (ORDER BY expr) AS quartile FROM egfr ), sample_to_patient AS ( SELECT sample_unique_id, patient_unique_id FROM clinical_data_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND type = 'sample' GROUP BY sample_unique_id, patient_unique_id ), os AS ( SELECT patient_unique_id, max(CASE WHEN attribute_name = 'OS_MONTHS' THEN attribute_value END) AS os_months, max(CASE WHEN attribute_name = 'OS_STATUS' THEN attribute_value END) AS os_status FROM clinical_data_derived WHERE cancer_study_identifier = 'luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018' AND type = 'patient' AND attribute_name IN ('OS_MONTHS','OS_STATUS') GROUP BY patient_unique_id ) SELECT CASE WHEN r.quartile = 4 THEN 'Top quartile (high EGFR)' WHEN r.quartile = 1 THEN 'Bottom quartile (low EGFR)' ELSE 'middle' END AS grp, count() AS n_patients, countIf(os.os_status LIKE '1:%') AS n_events, countIf(os.os_status LIKE '0:%') AS n_censored, round(min(toFloat64OrNull(os.os_months)),1) AS min_followup, round(max(toFloat64OrNull(os.os_months)),1) AS max_followup FROM ranked r JOIN sample_to_patient stp USING (sample_unique_id) JOIN os USING (patient_unique_id) WHERE r.quartile IN (1,4) GROUP BY grp ORDER BY grp " } ◀ result {"rows":[{"grp":"Bottom quartile (low EGFR)","n_patients":128,"n_events":49,"n_censored":79,"min_followup":0.4,"max_followup":232.2},{"grp":"Top quartile (high EGFR)","n_patients":127,"n_events":51,"n_censored":76,"min_followup":0,"max_followup":163.1}]} ▶ resolve_and_route { "studyIds": [ "luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018" ] } ◀ result {"success":true,"message":"Found 1 study. Use the metadata to call the appropriate navigation tool(s).","data":{"totalCount":1,"studiesWithMetadata":[{"studyId":"luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","name":"Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas)","sampleCount":566,"studyViewUrl":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study?id=luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","metadata":{"clinicalAttributeIds":["AGE","AJCC_PATHOLOGIC_TUMOR_STAGE","AJCC_STAGING_EDITION","ANEUPLOIDY_SCORE","BUFFA_HYPOXIA_SCORE","CANCER_TYPE","CANCER_TYPE_ACRONYM","CANCER_TYPE_DETAILED","DAYS_LAST_FOLLOWUP","DAYS_TO_BIRTH","DAYS_TO_INITIAL_PATHOLOGIC_DIAGNOSIS","DFS_MONTHS","DFS_STATUS","DSS_MONTHS","DSS_STATUS","ETHNICITY","FORM_COMPLETION_DATE","FRACTION_GENOME_ALTERED","GENETIC_ANCESTRY_LABEL","GRADE","HISTORY_NEOADJUVANT_TRTYN","ICD_10","ICD_O_3_HISTOLOGY","ICD_O_3_SITE","INFORMED_CONSENT_VERIFIED","IN_PANCANPATHWAYS_FREEZE","MSI_SCORE_MANTIS","MSI_SENSOR_SCORE","MUTATION_COUNT","NEW_TUMOR_EVENT_AFTER_INITIAL_TREATMENT","ONCOTREE_CODE","OS_MONTHS","OS_STATUS","OTHER_PATIENT_ID","PATH_M_STAGE","PATH_N_STAGE","PATH_T_STAGE","PERSON_NEOPLASM_CANCER_STATUS","PFS_MONTHS","PFS_STATUS","PRIMARY_LYMPH_NODE_PRESENTATION_ASSESSMENT","PRIOR_DX","RACE","RADIATION_THERAPY","RAGNUM_HYPOXIA_SCORE","SAMPLE_COUNT","SAMPLE_TYPE","SEX","SOMATIC_STATUS","SUBTYPE","TBL_SCORE","TISSUE_PROSPECTIVE_COLLECTION_INDICATOR","TISSUE_RETROSPECTIVE_COLLECTION_INDICATOR","TISSUE_SOURCE_SITE","TISSUE_SOURCE_SITE_CODE","TMB_NONSYNONYMOUS","TUMOR_TISSUE_SITE","TUMOR_TYPE","WEIGHT","WINTER_HYPOXIA_SCORE"],"molecularProfileIds":["luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_gistic","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_log2CNA","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_mutations","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_Zscores","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_all_sample_Zscores","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_all_sample_ref_normal_Zscores","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rppa","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rppa_Zscores","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_structural_variants"],"genericAssayProfiles":["luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_armlevel_cna","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_genetic_ancestry","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_methylation_hm27_hm450_merge","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_methylation_hm450"],"heatmapProfileIds":["luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_Zscores","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_all_sample_Zscores","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rna_seq_v2_mrna_median_all_sample_ref_normal_Zscores","luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018_rppa_Zscores"],"availableComparisonTabs":["overlap","clinical","survival","alterations","mutations","mrna","protein","generic_assay_armlevel_cna","generic_assay_genetic_ancestry","generic_assay_methylation"]}}]}} ▶ get_studyviewfilter_options { "studyId": "luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018", "geneSpecificQueries": [ { "hugoGeneSymbol": "EGFR", "profileType": "rna_seq_v2_mrna" } ] } ◀ result {"success":true,"message":"Successfully retrieved StudyView filter options","data":{"studyId":"luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","geneSpecificCounts":[{"hugoGeneSymbol":"EGFR","profileType":"rna_seq_v2_mrna","bins":[{"end":538.388,"count":128},{"start":538.388,"end":994.5969999999995,"count":127},{"start":994.5969999999995,"end":1772.42,"count":128},{"start":1772.42,"count":127}]}]}} ▶ navigate_to_group_comparison { "studyIds": [ "luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018" ], "tab": "survival", "groups": [ { "name": "EGFR mRNA - Top quartile", "studyViewFilter": { "genomicDataFilters": [ { "hugoGeneSymbol": "EGFR", "profileType": "rna_seq_v2_mrna", "values": [ { "start": 1772.42 } ] } ] } }, { "name": "EGFR mRNA - Bottom quartile", "studyViewFilter": { "genomicDataFilters": [ { "hugoGeneSymbol": "EGFR", "profileType": "rna_seq_v2_mrna", "values": [ { "end": 538.388 } ] } ] } } ] } ◀ result {"success":true,"message":"Navigating to https://www.cbioportal.org/comparison/survival?comparisonId=6ab7f505c2115c492d885146","url":"https://www.cbioportal.org/comparison/survival?comparisonId=6ab7f505c2115c492d885146","data":{"description":"Group comparison (2 custom groups)","studies":["luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018"],"totalGroups":2,"groups":[{"name":"EGFR mRNA - Top quartile","sampleCount":127},{"name":"EGFR mRNA - Bottom quartile","sampleCount":128}],"studyViewUrl":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study?id=luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018","groupUrls":[{"groupName":"EGFR mRNA - Top quartile","url":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study?id=luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018#filterJson=%7B%22genomicDataFilters%22%3A%5B%7B%22hugoGeneSymbol%22%3A%22EGFR%22%2C%22profileType%22%3A%22rna_seq_v2_mrna%22%2C%22values%22%3A%5B%7B%22start%22%3A1772.42%7D%5D%7D%5D%7D"},{"groupName":"EGFR mRNA - Bottom quartile","url":"https://www.cbioportal.org/study?id=luad_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018#filterJson=%7B%22genomicDataFilters%22%3A%5B%7B%22hugoGeneSymbol%22%3A%22EGFR%22%2C%22profileType%22%3A%22rna_seq_v2_mrna%22%2C%22values%22%3A%5B%7B%22end%22%3A538.388%7D%5D%7D%5D%7D"}],"pageDescription":"Kaplan-Meier survival analysis comparing EGFR mRNA - Top quartile (127) vs EGFR mRNA - Bottom quartile (128)."}} ═ answer (success) ## Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas) — EGFR mRNA and Overall Survival Using the **Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas)** cohort (566 samples; 510 with mRNA expression data), I split patients into quartiles of EGFR mRNA expression (RSEM, `rna_seq_v2_mrna`): | Group | Patients | OS events (deceased) | Censored (alive/last follow-up) | Follow-up range (months) | |---|---|---|---|---| | **Top quartile (high EGFR)** | 127 | 51 | 76 | 0 – 163.1 | | **Bottom quartile (low EGFR)** | 128 | 49 | 79 | 0.4 – 232.2 | At a glance, event counts are similar between the two groups (~40% each), but this is not a survival comparison — event counts alone don't tell you whether time-to-event differs. Determining whether overall survival actually differs between high- and low-EGFR-expression patients requires a Kaplan-Meier estimate with a log-rank test, which accounts for censoring (patients still alive contribute follow-up time but haven't had the event yet). I can't compute a log-rank p-value or Kaplan-Meier median survival myself — the database only stores raw survival times/status, not statistical test outputs. **Next step:** the linked Group Comparison Survival tab below runs the Kaplan-Meier + log-rank test directly and will show you the curves and p-value: [EGFR mRNA Top Quartile vs Bottom Quartile — Survival Comparison](https://www.cbioportal.org/comparison/survival?comparisonId=6ab7f505c2115c492d885146) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis comparing EGFR mRNA Top quartile (127 patients) vs Bottom quartile (128 patients) in this cohort. If you'd rather run it yourself: pull `(OS_MONTHS, OS_STATUS)` for each group and use `survival::survfit`/`survdiff` in R or `lifelines.KaplanMeierFitter` + log-rank in Python.